On 11/17/25 10:13, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: >> 9265* Janet+ 3.0 Somewhat broader decision >> security > PRESENT. While the additions make sense, I think the clause about > "causing an Agoran decision to cease being an Agoran decision" should > be re-added. Consider a hypothetical scam creating this Power=1 rule: > > Agoran thought exercises have the same attributes and effects > as Agoran decisions, except as specified by this rule. > > The Transport Supremo CAN, by announcement: > > * Cause an Agoran decision to cease being an Agoran decision > and instead become an Agoran thought exercise, or vice versa. > > * Alter an attribute of an Agoran thought exercise.
I've addressed this with my latest proposal. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
