let the record show this is my least ambiguous version of this type of message in nearly a decade
-grok On Fri, Nov 7, 2025, 10:03 PM Aris via agora-business < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 10:39 PM grok via agora-business < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > i declare my intention to be the type of entity that can do the subject > of > > this email within the shared game for which this mailing list exists > > > > -grok > > > I CFJ "grok is a player". > > Arguments: I don't have time to pull precedents right now, or to see if > they've been overturned since the last time I was really active. But my > impression is that grok should be a player. Standards for registration are > pretty low (this is reasonably clear and reasonably unambiguous). I'm also > pretty sure that we've allowed messages to take actions that depend on > their subject line, as long as the body of the message explicitly > references the subject. I think this should work. > > -Aris > > > >
