Seems to me like an attempt to fix what ain't broken. At minimum, the class should be far, far lower, especially for an offence with clear ambiguity as to what "reasonably expected" means.
On October 26, 2025 1:54:39 PM PDT, Edward Murphy via agora-business <[email protected]> wrote: >Proposal: No more apathetic apathy > >Amend Rule 2465 (Victory by Apathy) by appending this text: > > Announcing intent to Declare Apathy is the Class 5 Infraction of > Goldbricking, but this infraction is automatically forgiven if its > sponsor successfully Declares Apathy on the basis of that intent, > and SHOULD be forgiven if its sponsor demonstrates that e > reasonably expected to be able to do so (e.g. by exploiting a bug > in the rules governing tabled actions, or privately bribing > players not specified to win, but not simply by announcing intent > and hoping that no other players checked e-mail for a few days). > >-- >[ANSC H:GE] >
