On 9/21/25 15:23, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: > Proposal: Streamlined fees > (AI = 3) > > Amend Rule 2579 (Fee-based Actions) by replacing this text: > > To use a fee-based method, an entity (the Actor) who is otherwise > permitted to perform the action must announce that e is performing > the action; the announcement must specify the correct set of > assets for the fee and indicate intent to pay that fee for the > sole purpose of using that method to perform that action. > > with this text: > > To use a fee-based method, an entity (the Actor) who is otherwise > permitted to perform the action must announce that e is performing > the action; such an announcement indicates intent to pay that fee > for the sole purpose of using that method to perform that action, > and e SHALL specify the correct set of assets for that fee, though > simplified wording such as "I buy X" is sufficient if the fee paid > is reasonably unambiguous. > > [This month, there were half a dozen announcements like "I buy X" or "I > plant X" where there was no ambiguity what was intended. This proposal > may open up some obscure loopholes, but that still seems preferable to > repeatedly tripping over wording that seems like it ought to work.] >
Is it deliberate that this goes from the attempt failing if an incorrect set of assets is specified to the attempt silently succeeding and also being a crime? That seems like a very odd result. In any event, the looser should also include a clarity requirement. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
