Janet wrote:
This doesn't seem to actually address the issue of perverse incentives? It creates *different* incentives (by creating but not transferring) but doesn't change the fact that people are incentivized to vote against proposals they didn't author in order to prevent them from gaining economic benefits.
Some ideas: Cap the crystal benefit from a single proposal. (Crystals aren't the only economic benefit of proposals, e.g. there are also a couple Ribbons that depend on them. So it depends on the benefit being large enough, and/or the voter's interest in the proposal on its own merits being small enough.) Bring back disinterested proposals (a proposal identified as such when submitted does not trigger other rules granting rewards to its author or co-authors). -- [ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
