> > "Declaring Apathy" is the action that resolves the intent.
Is it? By my reading of Rule 2124, the intent would resolve when it becomes mature and ripe, so 14 days from now. A rule purporting to allow a person to perform a tabled action > allows em to do so by announcement, if, considering only intents > for that action/method combination: > * Without N Objections: e is a sponsor of a mature ripe intent with > less than N objectors. And it's not clear to me from any rule that you must say "I intend to..." in order to make an intent. I don't know about anyone else, but I only do things that I intend to do, so to me "I do X" implies "I intend to do X". On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:29 AM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Will you continue objecting to any intents to declare Apathy, even if they > include you in the list of beneficiaries? > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:27, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <[ > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org](mailto:On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 16:27, > Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <<a href=)> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:22 AM Oliver Nguyen via agora-discussion < > > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > >> I think e intended to create a new intent to declare Apathy, not resolve > >> the previous one, which you objected to. > > > > E likely did, but e didn't write it as an intent. > > > > On 8/27/24 11:23, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion wrote: > >> I did, yes. In my view it's a new intent because the list of > beneficiaries > >> is different. > > > > "Declaring Apathy" is the action that resolves the intent. If you want > > to make an intent, you have to write "I intend to declare Apathy, > > specifying [...]". > > > > There's little point in doing so right now, however. I'm going to > > continue objecting to any such intents. > > > > -- > > Janet Cobb > > > > Assessor, Rulekeepor
