For the purposes of the geologist, has the rule been amended with no
changes, or no amendment made at all?
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Janet Cobb via agora-official <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org>
Date: Sat, Jul 13, 2024, 2:28 PM
Subject: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Notes on Application of Proposals 9134-9141
To: Agora Official <agora-offic...@agoranomic.org>
Cc: Janet Cobb <janet.agora@unspecified.systems>
Proposal 9136 reads, in part:
> Amend Rule 2691 ("Sortition Procedure") by, as a single amendment,
> replacing the pargraph
> {
> At the beginning of each quarter, the ADoP CAN by announcement, and
> SHALL in a timely manner, initiate a sorition for each sortitioned
> office if e has not already done so for that office.
> }
> with the following paragraphs:
> {
> A player CAN by announcement initiate a sortition for a vacant
> sortitioned office for which a sortition is not ongoing. At the
> beginning of each quarter, for each sortitioned office for which a
> sortition is not ongoing, the ADoP CAN once by announcement, and SHALL
> in a timely fashion, initiate a sortition.
>
> Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, a sortition CANNOT be initiated
> for an office for which a sortition is ongoing.
> }
> and by appending the following paragraph:
> {
> If a sortition is ever ongoing for a non-sortitioned office (or for an
> office that no longer exists), that sortition immediately ends.
> }
This amendment fails: the text to replace of the first part is not found
in the rule (having been changed by P9132). As this is a single
amendment, the amendment fails in whole.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
