On 7/12/24 17:09, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
> Proto: ("No Indestructible Promises" AI=2.2)
>
> [This allows the owner of a promise to destroy it and explicitly defines
> "revoke" as a synonym for destroy
>
> Also, is there any reason for a creator to take eir own promise but not
> destroy it? Cashing one's own promise seems pointless, and there's no way to
> transfer it back to the Library or another player. For tidiness, this
> amendment removes that option.]
>
> Amend rule 2618 (Promises) by replacing the text:
>
> The creator of a promise CAN take or revoke it from the Library by
> announcement, unless the promise's text unambiguously designates
> it as irrevocable. Any player CAN revoke a specified promise from
> the Library without objection. If a promise specifies expiration
> conditions then any player CAN by announcement destroy it while
> the expiration conditions are unambiguously met.
>
> with the text (including a numbered list):
>
> A player CAN destroy (syn. "revoke") a specified promise under
> any of the following circumstances:
>
> 1) by announcement, if e is the creator of the promise, the
> Library owns the promise, and the promise's text does not
> unambiguously designate it as irrevocable.
>
> 2) without objection, if the Library owns the promise.
>
> 3) by announcement, if the promise specifies one or more
> expiration conditions that are unambiguously met.
>
> 4) by announcement, if e owns the promise.
"revoke" is already defined in R2577. Destruction by announcement is
also authorized there.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
