On 7/1/24 11:25, Agora amdw42 via agora-discussion wrote: > I vote as follows: >> 9134~ snail, ais523 1.0 It takes two > FOR >> 9135~ snail 1.0 Ammo Store > AGAINST >> 9136~ Janet, Kate, Mischief 3.0 Sorting out sortition > FOR >> 9137~ Quadrantal, Aris 1.7 A possible patch for a peculiar >> persisting pledge paradox > FOR >> 9138~ Janet 2.0 Stone cost adjustments > FOR >> 9139~ Mischief, Janet 2.0 Protection Stone Fix > FOR >> 9140~ Quadrantal, Janet 2.0 Whoops, missed one > FOR >> 9141~ Janet 2.0 Time for some clarifications > FOR > > > I shall update the spreadsheet accordingly > —— > Ben > ________________________________ > From: agora-business <agora-business-boun...@agoranomic.org> on behalf of > Janet Cobb via agora-business <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> > Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2024 11:09:40 PM > To: Agora Business <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> > Cc: Janet Cobb <janet.agora@unspecified.systems> > Subject: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Propositions 9134-9141 > > I vote as follows >> 9134~ snail, ais523 1.0 It takes two > FOR > > >> 9135~ snail 1.0 Ammo Store > AGAINST > > >> 9136* Janet, Kate, Mischief 3.0 Sorting out sortition > FOR > > >> 9137~ Quadrantal, Aris 1.7 A possible patch for a peculiar >> persisting pledge paradox > FOR > > >> 9138~ Janet 2.0 Stone cost adjustments > FOR > > >> 9139~ Mischief, Janet 2.0 Protection Stone Fix > FOR, I guess, but this feels fragile based on precedence. I think "being > granted immunity if not owned by Agora" and "actually being immune" > should have different terms. > > >> 9140~ Quadrantal, Janet 2.0 Whoops, missed one > FOR > > >> 9141~ Janet 2.0 Time for some clarifications > FOR > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
NttPF -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
