On 4/30/24 11:52, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> I object.
> Per Rule 2576 "Ownership", the asset goes into abeyance as soon as the
> owner is ambiguous.
> The owner becomes ambiguous at step 2, wherein we are not sure if ais523
> can take the asset due to the ensuing contradiction.
> Therefore, both CFJs should be FALSE, as neither party can cash a promise
> that is in abeyance.
You cannot object to a judgment, but you can either file a Motion to
Reconsider or call a Moot on these CFJs. Here's the specifics of both:
{
Rule 911/55 (Power=1.7)
Motions and Moots
If a judgement has been in effect for less then seven days and has
not been entered into Moot, then:
- The judge of that CFJ CAN self-file a Motion to Reconsider the
case by announcement, if e has not already self-filed a Motion
to Reconsider that CFJ.
- Any Player CAN group-file a Motion to Reconsider the case with 2
support, if the CFJ has not had a Motion to Reconsider
group-filed for it at any time while it has been assigned to its
current judge.
When a Motion to Reconsider is so filed, the case is rendered open
again.
If a CFJ has a judgement assigned, a player CAN enter that
judgement into Moot with N+2 support, where N is the number of
weeks since that judgement has been assigned, rounded down. When
this occurs, the CFJ is suspended, and the Arbitor is once
authorized to initiate the Agoran decision to determine public
confidence in the judgement, which e SHALL do in a timely fashion.
For this decision, the vote collector is the Arbitor and the valid
options are AFFIRM, REMAND, and REMIT. When the decision is
resolved, the effect depends on the outcome:
- AFFIRM, FAILED QUORUM: The judgement is reassigned to the case,
and cannot be entered into Moot again.
- REMAND: The case becomes open again.
- REMIT: The case becomes open again, and the current judge is
recused. The Arbitor SHALL NOT assign em to the case again
unless no other eligible judges have displayed interest in
judging.
}
--
nix
Arbitor, Spendor
