On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 9:10 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 4/21/24 18:04, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 3:12 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business < > > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > >>> 9099~ snail 2.0 Quantum Superstone > >> AGAINST > >> > >> > >>> 9100~ snail 2.0 Spending Stone > >> AGAINST > >> > >> > >>> 9101~ snail 2.0 Unstable Stone > >> AGAINST > >> > >> -- > >> Janet Cobb > >> > >> Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > >> > > Why no stones? > > -- > > snail > > > Quantum Superstone: A nightmare to track. > It wouldn't be THAT bad i think, but alright. > > Unstable Stone: I remain opposed to crystals and extending them into > other areas of the game. > > Spending Stone: As the Stonemason, I don't want to incentivize massive > numbers of wieldings in the same message because that increases my > workload. > This one doesn't make sense, the stones would probably be wielded anyways, and this would just make it more likely it'd be done in the same message instead of seperate ones, which seems like less or equal work. -- snail
