On 3/16/24 14:55, nix via agora-business wrote: > Given that agoran tradition has suggested that this formulation works > for at least 4 years and perhaps more than a decade, that no previous > CFJ has raised any concerns about this (despite many CFJs scrutinizing > Rules 105 and 106), and that "by proposal" is established in at least > one other rule as a recognizable method, I judge this CFJ TRUE.
One quick thought to add: I suspect one or two people will want to reconsider this. If they do, I strongly suggest they come up with compelling arguments for why this was missed by every CFJ on Rule 105, every Promotor, and every player in 10 years. It strikes me that the person saying "everyone but me is wrong" needs a damn good argument for how that could occur. -- nix
