On 1/1/24 16:54, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > This has precedence issues with redefining "fee" but it's probably fine. > It happens to work fine now since this rule will take precedence over > the other rules enacted in this proposal, but if a Rule with power > 1 > or a Rule enacted before this proposal was changed to use this > definition, it wouldn't apply (except *maybe* through the "reasonable > clarification" clause but that's really questionable in my opinion).
Correction: it is *not* probably fine, that was left over from an earlier draft, oops. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
