Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-11-27 11:38]: > Consider a referendum on an AI 3 proposal A. Also consider a Rule X, > power 2: "If it is greater than 1, The AI of the referendum on proposal > A is immediately set to 1." > > Rule X and Rule 1950 are now both attempting to continuously set the AI > of the decision to different values, and this isn't a conflict per se so > precedence rules don't apply. So it isn't clear what value should be > used, and it might even try to revert to the default. This proposal > prevents that by preventing the power 2 rule from setting it to a value > such that it has to be automatically corrected.
Why is it not a conflict? When evaluating the effects of the rules, two different rules give two different actions for the same entity. It's clearly in conflict, as both actions cannot be done simultaneously. -- juan
