On 2023-11-20 11:37, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 6:55 AM Goren Barak via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> I will now ratify ratify the following document, using Rule 2202 >> (Ratification Without Objection): >> >> Effective a immediately, Goren now has 500 radiance. >> Their voting strength is now 15. >> Their Base Rockiness has also gone up to 100. >> >> Rule 2202 tells me to make my intentions clear, so my intentions are to >> win. >> >> Neither Rule 2202 nor Rule 1728 specify a period in which you can >> object, so that period is over. You can no longer object to this >> document. Thank you for your time. >> > > Per R2202, which Goren cited in the above: > A player SHALL NOT knowingly use or announce intent to use > Ratification Without Objection to ratify a (prior to ratification) > document containing incorrect or Indeterminate information when a > corrected document could be produced with reasonable effort, > unless the general nature of the document's error and reason for > ratifying it is clearly and plainly described in the announcement > of intent. Such ratification or announcement of intent to ratify > is the Class 8 Infraction of Endorsing Forgery. > > I note the above infraction committed by Goren. I suggest that the Referee > investigate and find em guilty of 0 blots, since we are kind to new players. > If e is found guilty of more blots, I plan to forgive em so e will have no > blots. :) > > (Goren, I recommend you keep trying to do things! This, one of the highest > crimes, could only get you 8 blots maximum! ONLY 8! you need 40 to even be > exiled as an outlaw! FOUR ZERO! FORTY!)
The intent was clearly described in the announcement, so I hopefully wouldn't be guilty. This should be a CFJ because we kind of need to have a precedent and clear this up.
