CoE: Rules as items v5 is the proposal with me as the author. That was to be withdrawn, and replaced with rules as items v6.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023, 4:13 AM secretsnail9 via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Dear CoEs relevant to the Promotor: everything should be fixed as of this > report/revision: > > PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW > > Important note: Proposal 9024 was never distributed, as it never existed. > > If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, > and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote > collector > is the Assessor, the quorum is 3, the voting method is AI-majority, and the > valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > conditional votes). > > > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > 9027* Kate, snail 3.0 De-Escalating the Hole > 9028~ Janet 2.0 Fairness in Crime Act > 9029~ snail, Zipzap 2.0 Sharing takes Care > 9030~ 4st 1.0 (n/a) > > > > > The proposal pool contains the following proposals: > > ID Author(s) AI Title > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. > <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. > > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where > the information shown below differs from the information shown above, > the information shown above shall control. > > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9027 > Title: De-Escalating the Hole > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Kate > Co-authors: snail > > Amend Rule 869 by replacing the following text: > > An Unregistered person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or > prevented by the rules) register > > with: > > An Unregistered person CAN (unless explicitly forbidden or > prevented by Rules of power 3 or greater) register > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9028 > Title: Fairness in Crime Act > Adoption index: 2.0 > Author: Janet > Co-authors: > > > > Amend Rule 2478 ("Justice") by, as a single amendment: > > { > > Replacing "Within 14 days of an infraction being committed," with > "Within 14 days of an infraction being committed, or if the infraction > has been noted in the past 60 days,". > > Then, replacing "any other player in the last 7 days" with "any other > player in the last 14 days". > > } > > [Harmonize the time limits to investigate and to note, and ensure a > noted infraction can always be investigated beyond the time limit to do > so (allowing deputization).] > > > Amend Rule 2531 ("Defendant's Rights") by, as a single amendment: > > { > > Appending a semicolon to the list item numbered (1), if it does not > already end in a semicolon. > > Then, deleting the trailing " or" from the list item numbered (4). > > Then, appending " or" to the list item numbered (5). > > Then, appending the following to the first list: { (6) any available > non-null punishment would be blatantly and obviously unsuited to the > conduct which constitutes the infraction or to the person who committed > the infraction. } > > Then, appending the following to the rule: > > { > > Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, any attempt to investigate an > infraction which would result in the creation of blots is INEFFECTIVE if: > > (1) it does not include the specific reason for the fine; or > > (2) it would result in a punishment that is blatantly and obviously > unsuited to the conduct which constitutes the infraction or to the > person who committed the infraction. > > } > > } > > [Restore the old "blatantly and obviously unsuited" standard to protect > defendants.] > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9029 > Title: Sharing takes Care > Adoption Index: 2.0 > Author: snail > Co-author(s): Zipzap > > > //comment: Changes "points" to "Radiance" > > Amend Rule 2675 (Dream of Wandering) to read, in full: > > { > > The Dream Keeper is an office; its holder is responsible for > keeping track of the dreams of all active players. > > Dream is a secured active player switch, tracked by the Dream > Keeper in eir weekly report, with possible values any Dream, > defaulting to Wandering. An "X Dreamer" is a player with eir Dream > switch set to X. > > An active player CAN "envision" eir own Dream, specifying any > valid value for eir Dream, by announcement. When the rules state > that the wandering occurs, every active player's Dream is set to > the value e most recently envisioned. If a player did not envision > a dream since the last wandering, it is not flipped. > > A wandering occurs at the beginning of each week. > > The following is an exhaustive list of all Dreams and the rules > relevant to each dream: > > - Wandering: This dream has no effect. > > - Charity: Immediately after a wandering, one stamp (chosen by > most-to-least owned by the L&FD at time of transfer, tie-broken > alphabetically) is transferred to each Charity Dreamer (in order > from least-to-most stamps owned, tie-broken alphabetically) from > the L&FD. If the number of Stamps the L&FD owned during the last > wandering is greater than 10, this process happens a second > time. If it is more than 20, this process happens a third time. > > - Justice: Immediately after a wandering, 1 blot is expunged from > each Justice Dreamer. If a Justice Dreamer had no blots > immediately after a wandering, e CAN once expunge one blot, by > announcement, from a specified player before the next wandering. > > - Sharing: Immediately after a wandering, each Sharing Dreamer has > eir Radiance increased by X / Y, rounded down, where X is half the > number of active players, rounded up, and Y is the number of > Sharing Dreamers. > > - Wealth: Immediately after a wandering, X stamps of eir own type > are granted to each Wealth Dreamer. When less than 8 Stamps of > eir type exist, X is 2. When 8 to 15 Stamps of eir type exist, X > is 1. When 16 ore more Stamps of eir type exist, X is 0. > > - Gardens: Immediately after a wandering, the Base Rockiness of > each Gardens Dreamer is increased by 1. > > - Power: Each Power Dreamer has eir voting strength increased by 2 > for referenda on ordinary proposals. > > - Revolution: A revolution is happening if the majority of active > players are Revolution Dreamers. Immediately after a wandering, > if a revolution is not happening, then all Revolution Dreamers > have eir radiance decreased by 1 to a minimum of 0. Immediately > after a wandering, if a revolution is happening, then all > players have eir radiance set to 100-X, where X was eir radiance > when the wandering occurred, and all player's Dreams are set to > Wandering. > > } > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > ID: 9030 > Title: (n/a) > Adoption Index: 1.0 > Author: 4st > Co-author(s): > > > The Geologist is the office that tracks crystals. > Each crystal is a liquid asset. > Each crystal has three secured natural integer switches, > one of which is the size, the second is its identity, > and the third is the instability. > The default size of a crystal is 1. > The default instability of a crystal is 0. > Each Quarter, the size is increased by 3 of all crystals with > identifiers that don't match any rule number in the current ruleset. > > Once for each rule a proposal amends or repeals: > - If a crystal with an identity equal to the number of that rule > exists, combine that proposal with that crystal. > - Otherwise, grant the author of the proposal a crystal with the > identity equal to the number of that rule, and size equal > to the power of that proposal, rounded up to the nearest integer. > > Whenever a proposal and a crystal combine: > - Increase the size of the crystal by the power of the proposal, > rounded up to the nearest integer. > - If the proposal's author doesn't own the crystal, > increase the instability of the crystal by 3. > - If the instability is larger than the size of the > crystal, transfer the crystal to the author of the proposal, and > reduce the instability of the crystal to its size. > > A player CAN, by announcement, Shatter the System, and attempting to > specify all crystallized players, provided that no player has won the > game by doing so in the past 30 days. An player is crystallized if > it owns crystals with a total size greater than or equal to the > number of rules in the current ruleset. > > When the System is Shattered, all crystallized players win the game. > If a player won the game in this manner 4 or more days ago, any > player CAN repeal this rule by announcement. > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > -- > snail >
