Janet Cobb via agora-business [2023-11-08 17:27]: > Neither of those holdings is relevant here. You made a series of false > statements which are falsy (many of them are nonsense and thus obviously > false, so you knew or should have known they were false; the others you > likely at least believed to be false), and you made them explicitly > under penalty of No Faking. That is sufficient to violate the Rule.
Objection: nonsense statements cannot be false. They are nonsense. Don't bring your own particular metaphysics to a public discussion. -- juan
