On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:08 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-official
<agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Created: 2023-05-22 by juan
> Up: {Aspen, G., Janet, Murphy, ais523, cuddlybanana, juan}
> Down: {4st, beokirby, blob, iWright, nix, snail, Yachay}
> Signatures: ais523, juan, (G, if G hasn't withdrawn eir signature), Janet,
> (4st, if this plan will not be harvested)
> ----
> Created: 2023-05-22 by Yachay
> Up: {4st, beokirby, blob, inalienableWright, nix, snail, Yachay}
> Down: {Aspen, ais523, cuddlybanana, G., Janet, juan, Murphy}
> Signatures: Yachay, beokirby, snail, (4st, if this plan will not be
> harvested)
[snip]
> Arguments FOR: G withdrew their consent (CFJ 4034), and 4st's consent
> didn't work or worked on both, so Yachay's plan was earliest and was tied
> for most signatures, and was thus harvested.
CFJ 4034 has been judged, and found that G. *didn't* withdraw eir
signature. So unless it's a paradox, it was Juan's plan that had the
most signatures. So (assuming CFJ 4034 stands) we could have FALSE or
PARADOX, but not TRUE for this cfj.
-G.
