Just to add, I believe that consent is able to be "withdrawn", or at least not longer applicable, because of Rule 2519, point 5; where it allows us to infer if consent is present or not depending on context. I believe the context can include factors such as what time it is, or simply explicit desire for the consent to no longer apply. "Reasonable context" is a very broad thing.
I think the references to sex in the judgement are amusing but gaudy. I hope that they're avoided in future versions of the Judgement. We could probably use "intimacy" or just "hugging", or something, instead. On Saturday, May 27, 2023, Kerim Aydin via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 10:40 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > (similar steps occur for withdrawal of consent.) > > I intend to file a Motion to Reconsider this judgement with 2 Support. > There is absolutely no mechanism or arguments presented that > withdrawal of consent is POSSIBLE, and this throwaway phrase is not > enough to convince me that withdrawal works. Overall it is beyond the > scope of this judgement as it is not required to determine how > withdrawal works to answer the question. > > -G. >
