Re: DIS: Re: BUS: (@Ricemastor) heheheheheheh

[Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion]

On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:34 AM Aspen via agora-discussion
<agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 3:52 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business
> <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > I withdraw my consent from all rice plans.
> > If the Reimann hypothesis is true, I consent to all rice plans that will
> > not be harvested.
> > (I humbly request that I get to call the CFJ upon harvest-time, so that I
> > may call a CFJ that results in PARADOXICAL.)
> >
> > Also, I intend to, without objection, clean rule 591 "Delivering
> > Judgements" by replacing "irresovable" with "irresolvable".
>
> I don't think this works? I mean, first off, there are all the reasons
> why trying to make something conditional on the Reimann hypothesis
> would just fail. You know, Rule 2518, and the precedents it is based
> on, and all of that. But even if that part worked, this isn't
> "logically undecidable as a result of a paradox or or other
> irresovable logical situation". It's just something we don't know the
> answer to, which would be DISMISS. (Incidentally, I'm not entirely
> sure all of the past paradox wins have met this standard; though
> they've definitely worked platonically in any case.)
>
> -Aris