I don't think that "re-submission" or "editting" intents are a thing but
the language seems to refer to just one single possible outcome, even if
its not worded precisely.
I want this to be good enough to work, but I'm not sure if CfJs are on my
side on this.
On Thursday, May 18, 2023, beokirby agora via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I re-submit my intent but edited to be replacing " ore " with " or "
>
> -Beokirby
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 2:38 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On 5/18/23 14:36, beokirby agora via agora-business wrote:
> > > I intend to clean Rule 2675 ("Dream of Wandering") by replacing "ore"
> > with
> > > "or"
> > >
> > > -Beokirby
> >
> >
> > I object. There are multiple instances of "ore" in that text (some part
> > of other words), and not all of them should be replaced.
> >
> > --
> > Janet Cobb
> >
> > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
> >
> >
>
