On Fri, 2023-05-12 at 06:04 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > Further it is clear from the text itself that it was intended > that this definition be "hidden" and continue to provide definitional > guidance (that's unique afaik when thinking of other old gamestate):
It can't provide definitional guidance. Rule 217 contains a complete list of things that can be used to interpret and apply the rules where their text is silent, and "the text of adopted proposals" isn't on the list. (So neither the text of proposal 4513, nor the text of proposal 8961 which references it, is relevant in the interpretation.) Do you have a past judgement to reference for the definition? (There's no game custom remaining at this point – I remembered that Invisibilitating had once been defined, which is why I voted AGAINST, but couldn't remember the details – and common sense and the best interests of the game may argue towards leaving the term defined or undefined but don't provide a definition.) -- ais523
