On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 4:47 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 4:16 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > On 4/29/23 02:20, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: > > > I vote as follows: > > > 8960 ABSENT > > > 8961 FOR > > > 8962 FOR > > > 8963 FOR > > > 8964 AGAINST > > > > > > (also, I am now accepting bribes.) > > > > > > The vote on 8960 fails. It is not clear which decision is being > > referenced (there are two P8960's). > > > > -- > > Janet Cobb > > > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > > > > > ABSENT is not a vote. Did you mean to reply to the one where I attempted to > vote FOR and referenced the context of nix who gave it the number 8960? > > -- > 4st > Referee > Uncertified Bad Idea Generator > Or, I suppose I should say, the vote would have failed anyways, since ABSENT is not a valid vote. -- 4st Referee Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
