I appreciate it, but I believe that's begging the question. It's only
possible to ratify that "Agora exists" if Agora already exists in the first
place.
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 5:20 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 3:35 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I intend to ratify without objection: {The current gamestate is the
> result
> > of an unbroken sequence of gameplay and unbroken continuous existence of
> > the game since the moment that this nomic has started to exist on June
> 30,
> > 1993, 00:04:30 GMT +1200.}
> >
>
> Maybe we should just ratify without objection: "Agoranomic currently
> exists."
> and then add a statement that doesn't ratify: (Whether or not the game
> didn't exist in the past, it now currently exists, wholly and legally. Even
> if the game ever experienced a discontinuity previously, it now currently
> exists, legally, and thus, if it ever did die or schrodinger die, the state
> observed of the game is that it is in fact alive.)
>
> Again, this wouldn't do anything, but I don't think you'd get as much
> objection. It's not necessary though, and on principle of RWO, it might get
> objected anyway.
> --
> 4st
> Referee and Deputy(AKA FAKE) webmastor
> Uncertified Bad Idea Generator
>
