On 4/2/23 17:13, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
> 8943 AGAINST
> I don't want to give Janet some radiance
> for something that hasn't gotten anyone
> any radiance yet.

Except you agree that it's broken?


> 8944 AGAINST
> I don't know what this does
> or what problem it 'fixes'
> and Janet doesn't need more radiance
> for another radiance win.

CFJ 4017.

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

Reply via email to