On 3/10/23 18:14, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> THUSLY, with the title "The Crystal",
> power=1.0 and the text vestigial:
> {
> This rule will assemblee
> effects enumerable by three!
>
> One of which, you will find,
> is that this rule must near-rhyme.
>
> The first of which is already done,
> Now near-rhyme on new rules of power 1.Is this intended to create a binding obligation on anything? > Crystals are tracked by The Geologist, > of whom you shall not remiss! Definition of Geologist? > Crystals be in natural form, liquid assets, > and each have two secured natural integer switch facets. > > The first of which is size, > the default size is one, we'll surmise. > The second of which is identity, > a number which we have plenty. Potential Cretans issue: "natural" vs "number" have different meanings for switches. > Whenever a proposal amends or repeals a rule, > we must be sure to follow these two tools: > - If a crystal with an identity equal to the number of that rule exists, > the author of the proposal gets those remits! > Its size by 1 increased, so the crystal shant become deceased. > - Otherwise, for the author of the proposal a crystal granted > with the identity equal to the number of that rule, planted. Not clear if this has any effects. "We must" does not suggest the rule applies effects. > What good would crystals be without any meaning that we see? > A player CAN, by announcement, Shatter the System, specifying one or more > crystallized entities. Specifying zero would leave you quite sore! > > An entity can be considered crystallized > if it owns crystals with a total size > bigger than or equal to the number of > rules in the current ruleset, love. > > This can happen provided that no entity for sure > has won the game by doing so in the past 30 days demure. What is "This"? > When the System is Shattered, the specified entities win the game. > If a shatter in this manner 4 or so days ago, now this rule is lame! Winning is defined only for persons. > When this rule is thusly shattered and lame, please, > anyone CAN repeal this rule by announcement, it'll put us at ease. This does nothing. Persons CANNOT repeal rules, even if a (power 1) rule says they can. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
