On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 9:04 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business < agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 3/3/23 17:26, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote: > > The below CFJ is 4015. I assign it to Janet. > > > > status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#4015 > > > > =============================== CFJ 4015 > =============================== > > > > This is a valid objection. > > > > > ========================================================================== > > > > Caller: 4st > > > > Judge: Janet > > > > > ========================================================================== > > > > History: > > > > Called by 4st: 01 Mar 2023 04:50:01 > > Assigned to Janet: [now] > > > > > ========================================================================== > > > > Caller's Evidence: > > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023, 3:59 PM Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote: > >>> ... > >> I oppose this intent because it is not my suggestion. :) > > > > Caller's Arguments: > > > > Arguments FOR: the intent is clear and unambiguous. > > (I think this is fairly clear, but Janet has issued a doubt without > making > > a CFJ and it will come time to decide whether the intent passed or not > > eventually.) > > > .... > Therefore... FALSE? > .... > I intend to, with 2 Agoran Support, file a group motion to reopen this case. I intend to, with 2 Agoran Support, enter the judgment into Moot. (I'm not sure which of these is appropriate, but I am sure the judgement is wrong. I'm sure an Agoran would say "I am against, but do not oppose" for fear that their againstness would be opposition, not "I oppose" to mean exactly that longer phrase.) AGAIN: The arguments FOR: The intent is clear and unambiguous. -- 4st
