On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:39 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:53 AM Forest Sweeney via agora-business > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Do you want to be able to just send "ANGER" to a-b, and for it to mean "I > > object to every intent to declare apathy."? > > Or "I floop" to motivate the horses, or "Ohgodnotanother" to mean "I > submit > > the following proposal:"? > > I think it would be useful to have a fairly flexible Agoran lexicon > that changes rapidly-enough to be easy to add for current gameplay, > but is stable enough to have reference value for everyone. It would > be great to say "I QWANG these items" to mean "I take these 5 steps > with them" at times when those 5 steps are a common sequence that > people use regularly (QWANG is a reference to when we talked about > doing this a few years ago). But I think this version of making it > personal like this is too obfuscatory for me, as an officer, it seems > a better approach would be - sure not so colorful, but more useful - > "The Definitional Regulations are tracked by (Notary?) and can be > added/amended/removed with some level of Consent". > > -G. > While that sounds more useful, it is exactly as you say, less colorful. I'm for this version, although having the Notary do it instead... I'm not opposed to either :) -- 4st
