Sorry I accidentally deleted a sentence at the beginning of my reply that said this concern was in spite of the first proposal sentence - just not really seeing the benefit of the partial tracking like that for cfjs
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 1:18 PM Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu> wrote: > I would not like to be considered a coauthor on this one, as IIRC my only > contribution was to speak against the cfj changes which you kept, so I > don’t endorse that. I think having switches that turn on and off on > tracking like that have the potential to create some significant level of > confusion with self-ratification eg if a switch is left off the list, then > ceases to be tracked invisibly, does it self ratify as an open case and > kick off the judge? Or since it’s a single switch type, it’s also not clear > to me that a “allegedly complete list” of the tracked ones wouldn’t ratify > the untracked ones to the default state. Just raises a whole can of worms > that could affect the status of ancient cases in a way we really might not > want. > > -G. > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 1:04 PM Edward Murphy via agora-business < > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> Proposal: Limited tracking >> (AI = 3, co-authors = Janet, G.) >> >> Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) by adding this paragraph to the list item >> regarding tracking: >> >> Alternatively, if the rules assign an office to track only some >> instances of a switch, then the report includes the value of >> those instances, but a document purporting to be such a list is >> not self-ratifying. >> >> Amend Rule 2606 (Proposal Classes) by replacing this text: >> >> Proposals created since the enactment of this rule have a secured >> untracked Class switch with possible values ordinary (the default) >> and democratic. >> >> with this text: >> >> Proposals created since the enactment of this rule have a secured >> Class switch, tracked by the Promotor for proposals in the >> Proposal Pool, with possible values ordinary (the default) and >> democratic. >> >> Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing this >> text: >> >> Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran >> decisions and proposals, secured at power 2. >> >> with this text: >> >> Adoption index (AI) is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions and >> proposals, secured at power 2, tracked by the Assessor for Agoran >> decisions not yet resolved, and by the Promotor for proposals in >> the Proposal Pool. >> >> Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing this text: >> >> Judge is an untracked CFJ switch with possible values of any >> person or former person, or "unassigned" (default). >> >> with this text: >> >> Judge is a CFJ switch, tracked by the Arbitor for CFJs that have >> been unassigned at any point during the past week, with possible >> values of any person or former person, or "unassigned" (default). >> >
