On 11/13/22 18:15, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: > I vote as follows (and have updated the spreadsheet): > >> 8866* Jason, Aspen 3.0 Restricted confederation > PRESENT (what about groups that were already grouped before, but then > the members explicitly decide/declare that they want that grouping to > also count as an Agoran person?) >
I think (hope) this wording includes that. My initial draft was "for the purpose of forming..." which definitely excludes that. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Mad Engineer, Rulekeepor, Stonemason