On 7/5/22 13:59, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> I don't think we do. Let's discuss some options.
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {
> Title: Option A
> Adoption index: 2.2
> Author: secretsnail
> Co-authors:
>
> Repeal Rule 2618 (Promises).
>
> }
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {
> Title: Option B
> Adoption index: 2.5
> Author: secretsnail
> Co-authors:
>
> Repeal Rule 1742 (Contracts).
>
> }
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> {
> Title: Option C
> Adoption index: 1.7
> Author: secretsnail
> Co-authors:
>
> Repeal Rule 2450 (Pledges).
>
> }
>
> There's a large overlap between these 3 rules. Even if none of these
> proposals end up passing, I do hope we can do something to clean up.
> Contracts could easily do the job of both pledges and promises, in my opinion.
>
> --
> secretsnail
They all serve different purposes and are useful under different
circumstances. Repealing contracts alone could be part of a reasonable
attempt to restructure the game away from economic contracts, but that
doesn't seem to be what's happening here.
--
Jason Cobb
Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
