On Sun, 2022-06-12 at 12:22 -0700, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > The Winds Died Down recently, beginning the procedure described in > R2658. > > It's pretty clear to me that all of the repeals of (1) went through, > and I can't think of an argument that those repeals failed.
The rule says "the following happen in order", referring to a list. If any of them can't happen, does that mean that none of them happen? I think our normal precedent is to do as much as possible, but I'm not sure why I think that, nor whether there's a rule about that, and there's more than one reasonable interpretation. -- ais523
