On 2022-04-11 10:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > > No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of > > judgements. However, that doesn't eliminate the fact that the precedent > > exists. Generally relevant precedents will be brought up by people aware > > of them when needed. > > I mean, it *might* be reasonable for a new player to think "I'm putting in > a high-powered proposal that claims to freeze agora, directly trying to > loophole something that the rules explicitly say is a High Crime and > shouldn't be done - maybe there's reasons I shouldn't do that." > > -G.
It might. And there may. There are also reasons to do it -- such as to expose such loophole. In any case, my action was to create a proposal (with a very high AI), which by definition can only be implemented with much support. I'd say it was nearly impossible for that action to ossify the game. -- juan
