On 3/15/22 21:47, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-16 at 02:39 +0000, nix via agora-business wrote:
>> Oops, there's two things I need to clean up here. I consent to, and then
>> do so, amending NOTA by:
>>
>> Replacing:
>> {
>> Any player may become a party to this contract. This contract may be
>> amended in a specified way by Agoran Consent where only parties to this
>> contract can support or object to the intent. When this contract is
>> amended, any party that did not support or object to the intent ceases
>> to be a party.
>> }
>> with:
>> {
>> Any player CAN become a party to this contract by announcement. This
>> contract CAN be amended in a specified way by Agoran Consent where only
>> parties to this contract can support or object to the intent. When this
>> contract is amended, any party that did not support the intent ceases to
>> be a party.
>> }
>
> FWIW, I caught this, and thought it might be the start of a really
> interesting mousetrap scam – it'd have been interesting to see where it
> went (and indeed who your confederate was). My hopes have been somewhat
> dashed to see that it was just a thinko with no ulterior motive behind it.
>
> --
> ais523
>
I strongly considered mousetrapping this when writing the "returnable"
part. But I have to defend my reputation. For future, better mousetraps.
--
nix
Herald
