On 7/27/2021 1:55 PM, Ned Strange via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, 2:31 AM D. Wet via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> I propose to create a new Rule in the Agoran commmunity to be adopted
>> according to the current rule adoption procedure. The Rule is:
>>
>> Onboarding of Newly Activated Players
>>
>> 1. Newly Activated Players MUST be requested to take their first Action
>> in a timely fashion after being switched to Active.
>>
>> 2. Players that are Active less than one month MUST actively be educated
>> when their Action is IMPOSSIBLE within the current Ruleset.
>>
>> 3. The education in referred to in 2. MUST contain references to N
>> specific Rules numbers as to why their Action is ILLEGAL within the
>> current Ruleset. N is at least 1 and at most 3 and NEED NOT to lead to a
>> POSSIBLE Action when taken into account during the next try to act.
>>
>
> I do believe this proposal is effective. It only needs to specify its
> text.
But was is its text? Is the first sentence part of the by-announcement
submission, or part of the proposal?
If the first sentence ("I propose...") is a proposal-submission statement,
then the rest of that sentence ("to create a new rule") is also part of
the submission statement, so not part of the proposal, so the proposal
would do nothing.
If "I propose" is part of the proposal, than the proposal wasn't submitted
to the pool, as that's not a clear by-announcement intent?
Or maybe it should be parsed: "I propose (to create a new Rule...)"; that
is, the proposal text begins "to create a new Rule". With some charity,
that could be called a Rules creation, but I'm not sure it passes
heightened R105 requirements for rule change specification?
-G.
