On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 3:04 PM Edward Murphy via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > Aris wrote: > > > Title: Ratification Rewrite > > Adoption index: 3.0 > > Author: Aris > > Co-authors: Jason, G., Murphy > [snip] > > Amend Rule 1551, "Ratification", by changing it to read as follows: > > > > When a statement is ratified, play proceeds as if the statement has > > become true, and the state of the game is updated accordingly. > [snip] > > Amend Rule 2201, "Self-Ratification", by changing it to read in full: > > > > When a public document is defined as self-ratifying by the rules > > remains continuously undoubted for one week, it is ratified > > that the statement became true and correct in all respects > > at its effective date.
That should be "document became true and correct". My error. > Apart from R1551 being confusing unless you remember R2201, it may also > be useful to also define "effective date" in the context of a statement > being ratified (e.g. without objection). In particular, if I try to RWO > "Bob had 14 coins at <specific time>" then that's pretty clear, but if I > try to RWO "Bob has 14 coins", then how should that be interpreted? > a) "Bob had 14 coins when intent was announced" > b) "Bob had 14 coins when resolution was announced" The idea is that the time is resolution by default. I'll think about how to make that more explicit. -Aris
