On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 3:45 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2021, at 11:13 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business 
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I submit the following proposal.
> >
> > -Aris
> > ---
> > Title: You CAN, CAN'T You?
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: Aris
> > Co-authors:
> >
> >
> > [Currently, there are a bunch of CANs without a method that thus fail.]
> >
> > Amend Rule 2585, "Birthday Gifts", by replacing:
> >
> >  During a player's Agoran Birthday and the 7 days following, each
> >  other player CAN, once, grant em X boatloads of coins, where X is
> >  3 if it is actually the day of the player's birthday, and 2
> >  otherwise.
> >
> > with:
> >
> >  During a player's Agoran Birthday and the 7 days following, each
> >  other player CAN once grant em X boatloads of coins by announcement,
> >  where X is 3 if it is actually the day of the player's birthday, and 2
> >  otherwise.
> >
> > ["Public designation" is used instead of "announcement" so as to not
> > invalidate the current method of simply publishing a report with the
> > relevant information.]
> >
> > Amend Rule 2141, "Role and Attributes of Rules", by replacing:
> >
> >  Every rule shall have an ID number, distinct among current and
> >  former rules, to be assigned once by the Rulekeepor.
> >
> > with:
> >
> >  Every rule shall have an ID number, distinct among current and
> >  former rules, to be assigned once by the Rulekeepor by public
> >  designation.
> >
> > Amend Rule 2608, "The Notary", by replacing:
> >
> >  If the Notary is required to report a title, but none has been
> >  otherwise publicly provided, e CAN select one.
> >
> > with:
> >
> >  If the Notary is required to report an entity's title, but none has been
> >  otherwise publicly provided, e CAN assign one by public designation.
>
> Thanks. This is necessary, and looks good.
>
> The term public designation could probably use a definition—I’d be quite 
> confused seeing it in the ruleset without one.

I would be happy to give it one, although I think it's clear enough
without one. Or, in other words, I think giving it a definition might
be an improvement, but I still think it's okay to pass the current
version.

-Aris

Reply via email to