On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:27:11PM -0800, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion 
wrote:
> On 1/27/2021 4:18 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On 1/6/21 4:28 PM, Falsifian via agora-official wrote:
> >> u Wes                 wesc at ichips.intel.com                     5 Apr 94
> >> u Timothy             timothy.ferguson at jcu.edu.au              12 Sep 94
> >> u Chuck               ccarroll at students.wisc.edu                5 Apr 94
> > 
> > 
> > This is not in order of ascending date.
> > 
> 
> Actually...
> 
> I'm not sure that 5 Apr 94 date means what the report currently suggests.
> 
> Chuck, for example, has two lines entered one here:
> 
> >> u Chuck               ccarroll at students.wisc.edu        5 Apr 94
> 
> and one here:
> 
> >> a Chuck               games_na at chuckcarroll.org 1 Sep 93   8 Jun 01
> 
> If 5 Apr 94 is taken as a deregistration date for Chuck, these entries are
> in conflict.
> 
> 5 Apr 94 lists many "deregistrations".  None of those entry lines have two
> dates (registration and deregistration dates).  It so happens that 5 Apr
> 94 is one of the earliest reports of players available in the extended
> archives (in Oerjan's mboxes listed on Zefram's page).  If you look back
> at a random report from say 2017, the alignment is more uncertain, and
> some of those 5 Apr 94 entries are lined up with registration, not
> deregistration:
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2017-May/011506.html
> 
> I looked through the events in Oerjan's archive around that 5 Apr 94 date
> and couldn't find any evidence of mass deregistrations.
> 
> Finally, if you look at the first available 2002 report, those entries are
> entirely missing:
> https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2002-November/000008.html
> 
> My guess is that, sometime after 2002, a registrar tried to reconstruct
> registration dates from the earliest available archives (the 5 Apr 94
> player report in Oerjan's archives), and listed those players with their
> earliest evidence of registration but not deregistration, and that has
> since gotten column-mangled?
> 
> -G.

Thanks. Will take a look some time later. If I can't figure it out I
can at least note the uncertainty.

-- 
Falsifian

Reply via email to