On 8/26/20 5:12 PM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote: >> ID Author(s) AI Title >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> 8490* Jason 3.0 Functional Emergency Regulations > AGAINST. > > [Why wouldn't the regulations take effect? Isn't R2614's "Emergency > Regulations CAN..." enough? If not, the arcane requirement to explicitly > say they're taking effect seems like a bug with the rest of the ruleset, > not with R2614. Sorry, I'm feeling curmudgeonly today about the > complexity of our ruleset.] > >
I was thinking of this through the lens of regulated actions. The regulations CAN do something but they are not provided a method to do so (and are not taking effect to do so). Another argument is that we have a whole framework for things that take effect, so it would be counter-intuitive for something outside that framework to be taking effect without any rules text to that end. -- Jason Cobb
