Im not sure this contract itself can technically override No Faking, however it should be clear from context as the game goes on that nobody intends their statenents to be true.
Acting on eir own behalf is fine terminology that we have used before. On Sun., 28 Jun. 2020, 11:21 am Jason Cobb via agora-discussion, < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 6/27/20 7:44 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion > wrote: > > Here are my draft regulations for the annual Birthday Tournament. > > > > I intend, Without 3 Objections, to enact the following — modified from > > previous Birthday regulations and a variety of rulesets for Diplomacy, > > primarily those of EPCC [0] and the official rules [1] — as the > > regulations for this year's Birthday Tournament. > > > > 0. P.S.S. CANNOT win this Tournament or become a Contestant. P.S.S. is > > the Gamemaster and Judge of this game. > > > > 1. Until July 7 or 7 days after the promulgation of these rules, > > whichever is later, any person CAN enter the contest (becoming a > > Contestant) by announcement, on eir own behalf, as long as no more than > > six other persons have already done so. > > > A person does not act on eir own behalf, e acts as emself. > > > > 10. Contestants SHALL NOT offer favors outside of this Tournament in > > order to influence the outcome of it. Contestants CAN and SHOULD lie and > > engage in deceit for personal gain. > > > Is this enough to override No Faking? > > > Otherwise, this all looks perfectly fine to me, a person who has never > played diplomacy before. > > -- > Jason Cobb > >
