On 6/23/20 8:58 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > What I mean to say is that, to my mind, closing a loophole that allows a > scam clearly against the intent of the rules is a strict subset of > rectifying a bug.
If it was closing the loophole when there's no scam pending I'd agree. But it's different when it's blocking a specific intent that already exists. You arguments would expand Certifying Patches to cover any proposal at all as long as it also patches things. -- nch Prime Minister, Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager
