On 6/19/2020 10:35 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: > These judgments are basically drafts. I'm assigning them because I've > got to assign something, but I'm happy to reconsider as appropriate. I > think the core of the arguments should be good though.
I think your judgements as-is are plenty for your current cases. I'm curious though, you implied your line of thinking would cover things like the Shinies case, but I don't see the connection too much, you talk about grammatical sensibilities (and how using a defined term of art like "exploded" would imply the undefined opposite of "unexploded") but that doesn't impact so much how nouns and terms of art are defined and redefined (e.g. jargon?) Not saying you need to add that, just curious where it was going...
