On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, 7:44 PM Rebecca via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> either choice is perfectly valid and fine, but given that stuff is always > changing, you may make a mistake with the new stuff and get caught in an > infinite chain at that point lol > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:28 AM ATMunn via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > so I, as I imagine others do, keep an always-current version of my > > report, in addition to the actual published reports. However, my > > question is this: If I publish a report, then more stuff happens (e.g. a > > new contract is created), and then someone makes a CoE, is it *wrong* to > > include that new stuff? i.e., does the revision have to be accurate to > > the original time of publishing and nothing after, or can it (or should > > it) be accurate to the time of publishing of the revision? > > > > -- > > ATMunn > > friendly neighborhood notary here :) > > > > > -- > From R. Lee > I think this would be a very interesting CFJ if the logic was ever used to COE a revised report. The rules don't specifically describe whether a report SHOULD or even CAN include newly reportable information unrelated to the Doubt if the report is revised. From a cursory glance, I think the two most important places to start are how you interpret the common definition of the word "revise" as used in R2201 and the interaction between "weekly" in R2143 and "Agoran week" in R1023. At least, that's where I would start preparing my arguments. For the record, R. Lee's answer is the most pragmatic. >
