On 6/14/20 1:18 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 11:08 AM nch via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: >> Inactivity in the game doesn't really mean unreachable though. omd has >> been active on github with an occasional month off for 7 straight years. >> This email address for me is an alias of my main protonmail address, and >> emails directly to me go to the main inbox which will pop up on a few of >> my devices immediately. The owners aren't the currently most engaged >> players, they're people who have shown consistent contactability. >> >> That said, I'm not really that invested in my criteria, I just chose >> what seemed reasonable. But if we're going to tweak it further, I'd >> rather seek some sort of consensus. > Says the person who just staged a coup without gathering any consensus > whatsoever. ;) > > Okay, actual reply time. Nothing you've said is incorrect. I simply > think that having to email someone who isn't active is annoying. It's > not a huge deal, and inactive-but-contactable players certainly work > as a backup. I'm just suggesting we should have more reliably on list > people so we need to contact the backups less often. > > -Aris
Totally agree with this, and Trigon just made some good points too. I'm starting to proto a rule that lets the Webmastor write regulations for the github that would regulate who should be owners, who is in charge of which repo, when to push vs fork and make a request... All of that will be based on a process of feedback and consensus. This was me realizing the system was set up really sloppily (and potentially dangerously) and deciding to do something about it in the meantime since I have no idea how long said regulations will take to make. -- nch Webmastor, NAX Exchange Manager, Pirate
