On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:57 AM ATMunn via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On 6/12/2020 11:51 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-discussion wrote: > >>> That may work. Another thing I should've mentioned here: I'd strongly > >>> encourage allowing contracts to own these. If players can only own one > >>> then they'd need an intermediary if they wanted to trade an amulet for > >>> someone else's, plus it'd allow for the complex trades NAX is designed > >>> to enable. > >>> > >> Oh yeah, didn't think about that. The next draft will definitely allow > >> contracts to own them. > > Letting contracts own them will preclude the use of an ownership > > restriction. > > What do you mean? can't I just say "amulets can be owned by players or > contracts"?
That will work. I just meant that a clause prohibiting anyone from owning more than one amulet would no longer have much impact.
