On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:50 AM James Cook via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 22:27, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-business <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:06 PM nch via agora-business > > <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 6/10/20 4:22 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > > > > > > > > I ossify Agora. > > > > > > > I point my finger at G. for Faking. At least one person believed e had > > > ossified Agora, and acted on it. > > > > > > > > > > I find this finger pointing to be valid; I impose the Cold Hand of > > Justice by levying an unforgivable fine of 1 blot on G. because this > > was clearly intentional but inconsequential. However, as a result of > > this, I believe that any attempt to impose a fine for the Indictment > > would be INEFFECTIVE because it is the same conduct for which e is > > being fined here. In other words, the plot thickens. > > I'm not convinced it was made with the intent to mislead. It looked to > me like an obvious attempt to test DADA with an action that doesn't > actually do anything. > > So now we have a buggy indictment process and a lesser fine which may > or may not have been successfully levied and so may or may not block > the indictment process from leading to a fine. > What I really like about Agora is that Agorans keep everything so simple. Gameplay is so concrete and grounded, and the players tale a common sense approach to the game, avoiding complexities such as hypotheticals and paradoxes. ;) -Aris
