On 6/7/2020 8:55 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> Just conceptually switches could be replaced with variables. Most of our 
> player-base probably has a passing understanding of computer variables, and 
> they fairly intuitively branch out into booleans, lists, integers and others.
> 

Ok, just IMO, we have a tendency to go too algorithmic as it is.  I have
enough in my RL to not want to take the programming route in our language,
and I'll twist a lot of other metaphors to keep this out [Also feel this
way, to a small extent, about the "promulgate regulations" language - if
you combined promulgation of regulations with coding class descriptions,
that's so close to my RL job I'll run away pretty fast ;) ]

(totally agree on Ribbons though).
            • ... Rebecca via agora-discussion
              • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
              • ... nch via agora-discussion
              • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
              • ... Rebecca via agora-discussion
              • ... nch via agora-discussion
              • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
              • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
              • ... Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
              • ... nch via agora-discussion
              • ... Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
              • ... nch via agora-discussion
              • ... Rebecca via agora-discussion
              • ... James Cook via agora-discussion
              • ... Reuben Staley via agora-discussion
            • ... nch via agora-discussion
              • ... Rebecca via agora-discussion
      • Re: DIS: Re:... nch via agora-discussion
  • DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF... Tyler M via agora-discussion
  • DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF... Aris Merchant via agora-discussion

Reply via email to