On 6/3/2020 10:36 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 10:04 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> On 6/3/2020 9:19 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-business wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:03 PM Aris Merchant wrote: >>>> >> >>> proposal when resolving it. Players SHOULD NOT attempt to game popularity. >>> >> >> Can we be a bit less moralistic about trying to game, well, a game? > > Did you read the comment? I just don't want to get into another > situation like the one with the Comptroller. Does anyone think it's > actually fun to have everyone putting conditional boilerplate in all > their votes? To me, that just seems like an annoying distraction. > Scams can be fun, but only when there's some cleverness involved.
I read it, and respectfully disagree. This isn't a scam or a major proposal-affecting power play like the Comptrollor, it's just a bit of prisoners dilemma voting or something, you know, like classic nomic. > Options: > - Change to a SHALL (with presumably a more precise definition) > - Make only unconditional votes count (this unnecessarily penalizes > endorsements and the like) > - Split this bit out into a different proposal (probably a good idea > in any case) - Take out the SHOULD and just let it be a game.
