On 5/31/2020 7:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On 5/31/2020 7:00 AM, Rebecca wrote: >> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:56 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >>> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 9:47 AM Rebecca wrote: >>>> >>>> Curiosity question, which win name do you get for winning by ribbons? I >>>> know G. won that way last year but I don't know which name is the ribbon >>>> one (there's no "ribbon" or "raising a banner") >>>> >>> >>> Previously, it has been listed for some as by banner, but it is now >>> listed as by Renaissance, in line with previous naming. >>> >> >> I assume paying 1000 coins is listed as high score? >> >> I would prefer that there are more categories and that the categories make >> it very clear what rule or system provided the victory, personally, but >> thats a matter for you >> > > No argument either way for coin wins, just to point out there was a bit of > discussion about this a couple months ago. In the past, if we had a win > type that was "accumulate N units by doing a range of Agoran things", the > Herald categorizes it as a high score win (the original win condition). > So Alexis decided that coins qualified. > > It's really the most lumped of the specified win types because it covered > several past systems with different names, I think all of the others > categories are specific to the particular game/era (Tournament and > Proposal wins combine different types of proposals and tournaments over > the years, but the underlying mechanisms for those is the same at least).
Meant to add: In that discussion we also kind of agreed that if a future herald went back and added the approximate era or other notes, to make the rule or system "very clear", it would be a welcome addition!
