On Fri, May 22, 2020, 3:59 PM nch via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> On Friday, May 22, 2020 3:35:45 PM CDT Aris Merchant via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:19 PM grok via agora-discussion
> >
> > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 22, 2020, 2:16 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
> > >
> > > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> > > > On 5/22/2020 12:09 PM, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:08 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > > >> Rule 2551:
> > > > >>       An Auction ends 7 days after its initiation, or immediately
> if
> > > > >>       no
> > > > >>       bid has been placed or withdrawn in the last 96 hours, or
> > > > >>       immediately if it is terminated.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Since no bid can be made until the auction starts (that's in
> R2550),
> > > >
> > > > then
> > > >
> > > > >> on the instant after it starts, the condition "no bid has been
> placed
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> withdrawn in the last 96 hours" would be TRUE...
> > > > >
> > > > > This has been noticed before... apparently not fixed though.
> > > >
> > > > lol I kept re-reading that phrase this morning thinking "surely I'm
> > > > missing something, something that glaring would have been noticed
> long
> > > > ago
> > > > given how many cfjs auctions have produced..."
> > >
> > > I think it depends on your interpretation of when hour 1 of the "last
> 96
> > > hours" is. I think it would be reasonable for a CFJ to conclude either
> way
> > > on this.
> >
> > I'm not seeing a textual interpretation where it doesn't time out
> > immediately. Could you explain?
> >
> > Though maybe some judge found something last time, I really would have
> > sworn this has come up before.
> >
> > -Aris
>
> I think grok is suggesting that "last" might not go before the initiation.
> But, unfortunately in this case, that wouldn't hold up to convention in
> Agora.
> Quite a few rules get passed with provisions like "If this hasn't happened
> in
> the last X days..." fully intending to be immediately triggerable.
>
>
> --
> nch
>

I think what I'm actually suggesting is that there's enough precedent that
a sympathetic judge may stay eir judgment or issue a clarifying judgment in
favor of common practice to give players enough time to patch up the rule.

>

Reply via email to